The U.S. Department of Justice has dismissed, without prejudice, federal fraud charges against Dr. Stephen Stepaniuk and his companies, Medical Legal Evaluations, Inc. and Safety Works Inc. Although the case is closed for now, the DOJ can reopen it later, keeping the legal matter unresolved.
DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Dr. Stephen Stepaniuk and His Companies
In a recent legal development, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has dismissed charges against Dr. Stephen Andrew Stepaniuk, along with his two companies: Medical Legal Evaluations, Inc. and Safety Works Inc.
This decision, signed on September 14, 2020 by Judge Cynthia Bashant, officially ends the case — at least for now.
What Was the Case About?
Initially, the DOJ filed charges under:
-
18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Mail Fraud
-
18 U.S.C. § 1346 – Honest Services Fraud
These charges typically involve using deception or violating a duty of trust, especially in professional or corporate contexts.
However, after reviewing the matter, the government decided to dismiss the case.
What Does “Dismissed Without Prejudice” Actually Mean?
In this case, the court dismissed the charges without prejudice. That term is important.
It means:
-
The charges are no longer active
-
The defendant is released from this case
-
However, the DOJ can file the charges again in the future, if necessary
In other words, this isn’t a final judgment. Instead, it’s a pause that leaves the door open for further action later.
Key Facts at a Glance
-
Defendant: Dr. Stephen Andrew Stepaniuk
-
Involved Companies: Medical Legal Evaluations, Inc. and Safety Works Inc.
-
Charges: Mail Fraud and Honest Services Fraud
-
Status: Case dismissed without prejudice
-
Date: September 14, 2020
-
Presiding Judge: Hon. Cynthia Bashant
What Happens Next?
Right now, Dr. Stepaniuk and his companies face no active charges. Even so, the government may revisit the case if new evidence surfaces.
Because the dismissal is without prejudice, it leaves the legal window open — meaning the matter isn’t necessarily over.
Why This Case Matters
This decision is important for several reasons. For one, it highlights how complex and fluid federal investigations can be. Additionally, professionals in the fields of medical legal consulting and occupational safety should pay attention.
Cases like this show:
-
How federal charges are handled
-
That dismissal does not always equal vindication
-
Why maintaining clear and ethical practices is essential
Final Thoughts
Although the charges are no longer pending, this case serves as a reminder of the high standards expected in regulated industries.
We’ll continue to monitor this case in case any new developments occur.